Define authorised responses
Translate security scenarios into configuration measures prepared in advance. Define trigger conditions, scope and required approvals.
Your security tools detect an anomaly. Your teams define the response. Our goal is to let them control Cyberlib through an API to adapt the configuration of affected endpoints from their own systems.
This page presents our goal of a complete API and multi-language SDKs. Available scope, languages and timing should be discussed with our teams for your integration project.
The ambition is to expose the solution’s full capabilities through an API: inspect fleet status, manage hardening templates, trigger operations and use their results. Your applications will be able to integrate Cyberlib into business and security processes.
Translate security scenarios into configuration measures prepared in advance. Define trigger conditions, scope and required approvals.
Plan to control Cyberlib from your orchestrator, ITSM tool or internal scripts without adding a manual intervention chain for every alert.
Decide which actions can be automated according to their service impact. Include operational constraints and business continuity when designing workflows.
A security tool detects abnormal use of a remote administration service. Your teams can design a workflow to temporarily strengthen the affected endpoint’s configuration using settings validated in advance.
Your EDR, SIEM or another security tool reports suspicious behaviour on an endpoint.
Your orchestrator checks signal reliability, identifies the endpoint and selects an authorised workflow.
The workflow calls the Cyberlib API to request application of the prepared configuration within the selected scope.
Your process retrieves the result, arranges a configuration check and updates incident tracking.
Your teams build and orchestrate the workflow. Cyberlib is intended to execute its hardening actions: for example, restrict a service or strengthen access settings, depending on API capabilities and the settings available for the affected system.
We aim to provide SDKs in several programming languages to make the API easier to use from your applications and automation. The goal is to simplify calls, response processing and error handling.
Supported languages and functions will be specified as the offering becomes available. Share your technical environment with us to scope your needs.
Reactive hardening complements your baseline configuration by adapting protection to a specific signal. Its effectiveness depends on a prepared, tested workflow proportionate to the affected service’s needs.
Define confidence criteria, thresholds and duplicate-alert handling. A single alert should not trigger uncontrolled fleet changes.
Plan a dedicated service identity and permissions limited to necessary actions. Explicitly target affected endpoints to avoid an overly broad response.
Test configurations in a pilot. Retain human approval for sensitive changes or those that may affect critical services.
Plan failure handling, a post-change audit and decision traceability. Returning to the normal configuration should follow an approved procedure after incident assessment.
Your detection tool, orchestrator, expected actions and development languages: let’s discuss an initial use case.
Reactive hardening triggers a targeted configuration change in response to a security event. For example, an anomaly detected by an existing tool can feed an orchestration scenario: select affected endpoints, apply an authorised model and verify the result. Scope, approvals and traceability must be defined before automation.
Define exposure reduction priorities ↗Cyberlib aims to provide a comprehensive API so customers can operate the solution remotely from their applications, scripts and orchestrators. Multilanguage SDKs are planned to simplify integration. Available interfaces, languages and delivery details should be agreed with the Cyberlib team for each project.
Discuss your integration scenario ↗Remembers your choice in this browser for 180 days.